On Elitism, The Haters Have A New And Distorted Definition

2
817

By Arthur Ballah

A common tactic of those who are in the business of finding fault is to blame the messenger when confronted with good message. Sometimes they also try to give new meanings to words in an attempt to confuse the reader or the listener. Such is the disposition of people we call “haters.” They cannot see reason; so the only thing to do in response is just to laugh at their distorted view of reality and go on.

This is the case of the FrontPage Newspaper writer who, stung by the brilliant decision of Dr. Mills Jones, standard bearer and political leader of the Movement for Economic Empowerment (MOVEE) to choose Dr. Samuel Reeves as his running mate, came to this conclusion: “His (Dr. Jones’) reported choice of Dr. Reeves is likely to raise eyebrows and possible cries of an elitist ticket.” Really, Mr. Rodney Sieh?  “Possible cries”? My only advice is, get real! I guess there should have been wailing and gnashing of teeth all over Liberia in response to elitism when George Weah, a Senator, named Jewel Taylor, another Senator and former first lady of Liberia, to be his running mate. But we didn’t hear as much as a wimple from Mr. Sieh. There should have also been people going down in sackcloth and ashes when Charles Brumskine, one of the major lawyers in the country and former President Pro Tempore of the Liberian Senate, chose Harrison Karnwea, former FDA Managing Director and former Minister of Internal Affairs, as his running mate. But where was Rodney Sieh to come up with his brilliant conclusion about elitism? Perhaps, we should give him the benefit of the doubt that this event escaped him. But what about the choice of Alexander Cummings, the former Coca-Cola Executive, naming Jeremiah Sulunteh, former Ambassador of Liberia to the United States, former Minister of Labor and former Minister of Transportation, to be his running mate? No elitism here, according to the dictionary of Rodney Sieh. Only when Jones, an economist, chooses Reeves, a pastor, does Rodney Sieh see the raising of eyebrows and the possible urge to cry elitism. What is more interesting is that neither the comments before Sieh’s conclusion about an elitist ticket nor the comments after show how Sieh came to his conclusion. Where does that leave the reader?

The eyes of the Liberian people are open now. They can draw their own conclusions regarding the field of presidential candidates. And it is clear to all fair-minded observers that the work of Dr. Jones and that of Dr. Reeves, rather than pointing to elitism, points in the direction of people who care for ordinary Liberians. We must ask Rodney Sieh, are the people across Liberia in towns and villages, even in the cities, who call Jones the ‘Poverty Doctor’ part of Rodney Sieh’ elites? Are the young people who are referred to as Zogos who are fed by Reeves part of Rodney Sieh’s elites? Is opening a school with health facilities in rural Liberia, with a company established to help earn funds to run the facilities, as was done by Dr. Reeves, the badge of a man wedded to elitism? Is trying to open a home for children made orphans by the Ebola Virus Disease a mark of elitism, something Dr. Reeves is trying to do? Is starting a micro-finance project that is one of the largest in the country, now operating in seven counties, something done by Reeves, elitism? Do we just call educated people “elitist,” even when they are using their education to serve humanity? Haters might answer “yes” to these questions, but we do not think so!

The question is, who actually is the elite? Perhaps, it is the writer of the article in FrontPage newspaper, because he is taking onto himself the right to define the thinking of “ordinary” Liberians. He believes that he can tell Liberians what is good for them. He considers himself to be the intellectual that should shape public opinion. Talk about elitism, that is it; setting oneself apart from “ordinary people.” The writer of the article is the “elite.” People cannot be fooled all the time. They are beginning to know their interest, and will not be misled. If there is any crying to be made over the Jones-Reeves ticket, it will be cries of hope. When ordinary people who have worked hard to “make something of themselves,” as we sometimes say in common speech, come together to do extraordinary things for the common good, that is not elitism. The people call it PUBLIC SERVICE.

2 COMMENTS

  1. The presidential ticket of the two PhD holders doesn’t suggest elitism, but it seems that Mill – Jones might have left pragmatism behind by his choice of a running mate, especially, under a steamy hot Congua – Country political climate. Don’t get me wrong, of course, the former CBL boss has emphasized “competence” as a significant leadership requirement, therefore, chose someone who met his criteria of a vice president.

    Notwithstanding, to ignore that long standing sectarian sentiment after its embers of animus were rekindled by Ellen’s neglect of not only reconciliation, but also in overseeing the allocation of a third of annual budget to bonanza compensations packages of few officials in the midst of pervasive poverty experienced by the vast majority is a tad mind – boggling. Granted that to rise from the rustic abyss in which a resource – rich country of so many talented citizens has laid our people need highly competent leaders to help operate the cranes that will do the lifting, however, one can’t be a politician without making political calculations.

    Moreover, far from being Machiavellian, the ideal is seldom practical in trying to convince millions of people from various backgrounds to one’s point of view.

    I’m not presuming to know how voters would cast their ballots, nonetheless, as a self – proclaimed advocate for reconciliation, stability with justice and lasting peace (beyond the rhetoric of “relative peace”), it has been a hope that each presidential ticket would reflect a bridging, if you will, of the Congua – Country divide. Lest we forget, there is presently “relative peace” because, unlike EJS, no Liberian is plotting to overthrow government, or invade the country.

    The question is, how long will it last?

    To end, without hesitation, we would like to wish the ticket of Dr. Mill Jones and Dr. Samuel Reeves well and good luck. Elections are numbers’ games, perhaps, they will surprise many of us entertaining the skepticism of a doubting Thomas. Moreover, most likely, they may merge with other political parties that share the goals of their manifesto. In the final analysis, as a past Daily Observer editorial advised, all of us should remain vigilant in ensuring free fair ethical elections. It is the only guarantee of deterring elections’ violence, folks.

  2. Thanks for your words of wisdom. You were very honest during your deliberation, because no matter how we handle this issue, the native/Congau factor will be a major determinant in this presidential election. Whether we admit it or not, most natives/indigenous are suspicious of the Americo-Liberians/Congaus. No amount of pretense can alter this these perceptions, so Dr. Jones should have been smarter than that. My opinion may not be a verdict, but these are projections that need to be considered.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here