Remembering President Tubman: Few Positives from His Administration

6
1647

Let us begin this Editorial by recalling what happened only a few weeks following President Tubman’s burial on July 29, 1971. A stream of delegations, over several days, found their way to the Centennial Memorial Pavilion to blast the fallen Liberian leader who had ruled Liberia for 27 unbroken years. And speaker after speaker quickly forgot all the highly positive adjectives they had only ninety days earlier heaped upon him, extolling him in the most glowing terms. Among the adjectives perennially used to describe this President were, “dynamic, farsighted, indefatigable and illustrious.” But this was all soon forgotten the minute breath left the President’s body on July 23, 1971 in the London Clinic.

They blasted Tubman and blamed him for all of Liberia’s development woes.

It is true that Tubman, given his immense popularity throughout the length and breadth of the Republic, could have done much more for Liberia. After all, the country was rich in mineral resources, abundant rainfall, vast acreage of arable land and most important, a small but intelligent and vibrant population. But the concessions agreements that practically gave away our iron ore, gold, diamonds and timber robbed the country of the great benefits that could have been derived from these God-given endowments.

On the other hand, Singapore and South Korea, which were in 1960 on par economically with Liberia, with our growth rate probably higher than theirs, soon surpassed Liberia in economic, social and industrial development.

What went wrong is a matter we leave to the economists and historians. The only other point we feel compelled to make here is that Liberia is still a vastly rich country with an even more vibrant population; and is, therefore, open and ready for future leaders to exploit. In other words, Liberia is still ripe for growth, development and prosperity. All we need is good, committed, patriotic, selfless leadership, and we are sure the people will follow.

Having said that, let us now recall what good President Tubman did for Liberia.

The first important thing he did was to initiate the Local and Foreign Scholarship Program that affected people from all over the country. Government paid for local scholarships for deserving and needy students in many schools across the country. The Foreign Scholarship Program awarded fellowships to Liberian students to travel to Europe, the United States and other parts of the world to engage in professional studies. This initiative produced the first cadre (group) of Liberian professionals—economists, mining engineers and geologists, scientists, educators in many fields, political scientists, medical doctors, civil servants, agriculturists, journalists and even secretarial scientists, etc.

President Tubman then transformed Liberia College, founded in 1862, into the University of Liberia (1951). Soon, UL opened the College of Liberal and Fine Arts, the Louis Arthur Grimes School of Law, the College of Agriculture and Forestry, Teachers College, the Science College, and the Business College.

But even before UL was established there came the Tubman National Institute of Medical Arts (TNIMA) that began training the nation’s nurses and paramedical personnel. Tubman also opened the Government Farm in Suacoco, now the Central Agricultural Research Institute (CARI). He also agreed with Episcopal Bishop Bravid W. Harris to transfer Old Cuttington from Tubman’s own home town, Cape Palmas, to Suacoco. In addition to the Liberal Arts education it provided, Cuttington started training agriculturists, scientists, many of whom went on to become medical doctors, ophthalmologists (eye doctors), surgeons and other specialists.

President Tubman also accomplished one great thing: during an official visit with President John F. Kennedy in Washington, Mr. Tubman appealed to his host for the building of a referral hospital in Liberia. President Kennedy agreed, and that is how we got the John F. Kennedy Medical Center which, before the 1980 coup d’état and the civil war, became the leading referral hospital in West Africa, staffed with scores of top medical specialists, most of them Liberian.

But perhaps President Tubman’s greatest accomplishment was his Unification Policy, which he established by convening all the chiefs from all ethnic groups and all parts of the country in Executive Councils, and convincing them to stop fighting among themselves and UNITE to build Liberia. The chiefs all wholeheartedly embraced the idea. Tubman did one thing more: to complete his idea of unification, he established the four new counties—Bong, Lofa, Nimba and Grand Gedeh. And each had its own indigenous Superintendent. In Bong, it was James Y. Gbarbea; in Lofa, Robert Kennedy; in Nimba, Gabriel Farngalo; and in Grand Gedeh, Moses Harris. And each new county had two Senators. This brought all the new counties on par with the five original counties—Montserrado, Grand Bassa, Sinoe, Maryland and Grand Cape Mount.

Liberia’s indigenous population never forgot Tubman for this, and that was one of the reasons they kept him in power for 27 years, electing him for another four years (equaling 31), which death denied him from fulfilling.

We will stop here for now, by making one more point, which some may find highly controversial: it is our strong belief that President Tolbert, who was Tubman’s Vice President for 19 years and succeeded him as President, got into trouble partly because he (Tolbert) did not follow Tubman’s Unification Policy to its logical conclusion—substantive power sharing.

For example, Tolbert had two opportunities to choose a Vice President from up country, but instead, chose two from the coastal areas, Sinoe (James Greene) and Montserrado, from even the very Careysburg District from which Tolbert himself hailed.

Authors

6 COMMENTS

  1. What about the NEGATIVES: Tubman was the Perpertrator-In-Chief for RITUALISTIC KILLINGS. Booming economy but no development. Government revenues came generally from the mining companies of Bomi, Bong, and Nimba, and Cape Mount Counties, but no development, no paved roads. In fact, very bad roads! No equipped schools. Liberia was for THE 1 PERCENT CONGAU ELITE!

    The Port that should have been built in Robertsport, Cape Mount, was never built because Tubman was an enemy of such progress. Tubman never believed in human rights. NO FREEDOM OF THE PRESS! NO RULE OF LAW! People could not read or be seen with certain books because Tubman did not respect the rule of law. THERE CAN BE NO POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT A TYRANT A DESPOT AND A DICTATOR!!!

  2. The author rightly informs his readers about a “few of Tubman’s positives”. Sadly for the Liberian people, all we end up with is a few of Tubman’s positives. One would think that after spending a little more than a fourth of a century in office as president, we’d be informed about innumerable positives of the late president.

    Was Tubman against competition?
    In the US, you may want to gas up your car at a major intersection. Sometimes at a major intersection, there are three different gas stations…. anyone of them could be a Shell, a BP or a Sunoco. Prices may not be the same, so you as a consumer you will decide on any one of the gas stations. On the other hand, none of the gas station managers will demand his or her competitors to close their gas stations down. Why not? Well, doing that will amount to being anti-competition or rumbuctious. Also,people have choices!

    So let’s go back to the drawing board. There was a time in Harper city (Tubman’s home town) when the Catholics operated an accredited 4-year teaching college. The college was called “Our Lady Of Fatima College”. The college awarded four-year teaching degrees to a good number of Liberians. Catholic schools and colleges have a good record of academic excellence. The readers must be informed that Fatima College was not a joke, rather a reputable teaching college. When Tubman drew plans for a Technical college to be constructed with the taxpayers’ money in Harper city, Fatima college was urged to shut it’s doors. Today, the Tubman college exists and is named in honor of him. Tubman college exists without a competitor. There’s only one college in the Southeastern region of our country. If Fatima college had been allowed to operate, young Liberian high school graduates would have had a choice of colleges. More importantly, there would have been more educators than what we have today. It seems that Tubman was not interested in the idea of choice.
    Was Tubman anti-competition or was he afraid of it? Also, was his move to shut down a good college a positive or a negative?

    Unification is a positive that the author mentions. The author states that if Tolbert had embraced or adapted some of Tubman’s ideas, Tolbert would have succeeded. Tolbert wasn’t ready for all of that. First and foremost, Tolbert served as VP for approximately 19 years and going up country to get a VP for himself would be seen as operating under Tubman’s shadow. Tolbert was his own man. His nine years of service as a president of Liberia made him to be a better president. A fair assessment of Tubman from my point of view is this: Tubman did a few positive things, but he squandered a unique opportunity to do more.

    Finally, there should not be a solo celebration of his birthday. Rather, there should be a day set aside for all deceased presidents to be celebrated. Presidents’ Day!

  3. F. Hney; I fully agree with you-“let’s abolish the Tubman-Holiday”; instead, celebrate Presidents’ Day. During the Tubman Administration, justice was not done to all men/women; especially for those who opposed President Tubman. Tubman grossly violated the rights of his fellow citizens.

  4. Mr. Freeman,
    You’re on the ball. A majority of people who have read what I wrote agree that one lone president should not be dignified like that. The issue of a change becomes a discomfort for many people. And I understand that! But, times change and we must act in accordance with the changing times. There was a time when cell phones did not exist. Today, the advancement of technology has made possible for cell phones to exist, even in the boondocks of Liberia. We’ve got to change!

    There are some who stress that Tubman served for 27 years and so a solo celebration of his birthday is warranted. To me, this position of such thinkers is untenable. Here is why. Hypothetically, if all of Liberia’s deceased presidents had served 27 years each, would the Liberian people celebrate 27 holidays throughout the 360-day calendar?

    Or, do all of Liberia’s deceased presidents have to be Maryland county native born citizens in order to be blessed with a solo birthday? Come on Frreman. Frankly, I did not know that that’s how significant we Marylanders are. Yeah, let’s go Marylanders. I was born in Maryland county, Liberia and I live in Maryland, USA. Up and down, i’ve got the Maryland DNA. But I don’t need a national holiday. Please keep it for our deceased presidents.

    On a serous not, I think that each deceased president of Liberia has had his fame. Whether this president, or that president was a bigot or not, let’s bygone that and present ourselves as people with 21st century innovative ideas. The legislators of Liberia must act expeditiously and not be seen as “do-nothing, but babble” senators and representatives.

    My next project I’d like to write about is the issue of a genuine minimum wage law in Liberia. But, it is not connected to the Tubman birthday issue.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here