We Commend the House for Dropping the Impeachment Case against the Three Supreme Court Justices

4
1289

When the row between the National Legislature and the Judiciary over interpretation of the Code of Conduct began, the Daily Observer was quick to suggest a prompt intervention to prevent the problem from being exacerbated. We called on all respectable Liberian institutions and the international community to intervene so as to bring the two branches of government to a cohesive understanding at this critical time of elections in our country. Our plea for intervention was predicated upon some negative consequences that could have resulted if the row had gotten out of hand. The Legislature and the Judiciary must coordinate in making and interpreting the law because without one the other cannot fully function. Both must trust each other in the execution of their respective duties to ensure stability and rule of law in our land.

As the conflict ensued and members of the House of Representatives, backed by some Senators, began the impeachment proceedings, it became fearfully evident that the country was headed toward anarchy, especially as politics intensified in this election period. Since Liberia transitioned from conflict to peace, justice has remained a serious challenge. Human rights reports and eyewitness accounts have shown judges receiving bribes and the poor denied justice. When conflict erupted over interpretation of the Code of Conduct in July, some lawyers reportedly worsened it by questioning the Supreme Court’s legal interpretation in setting free Harrison Karnwea and Jeremiah Sulunteh, vice standard-bearers of two political parties to contest the election. These instances, as we foresaw, would have caused the general public to lose confidence in our justice system, possibly leading to confusion and mob violence if the row had continued without intervention.

The justices and judges do not have constituents as the lawmakers have. Lawmakers could easily go to their constituents and politicize the issue to convince them, unlike the justices and judges who are hardly heard in public or political circles except when they render judgments in cases. If the conflict continued, we feared that justices and judges would have lost public respect and perhaps even threatened. This could undermine peace and the transition of power in this contentious election that every presidential candidate is fighting to win. What would happen if the need arose for the Supreme Court to decide an electoral conflict? In this case, perhaps only the Liberty Party (LP) and the Alternative National Congress (ANC) would have respected the decision of the Supreme Court since such decision arising from interpreting the Code of Conduct was in their interest. A very serious conflict would have then emerged.

We laud the Inter-Religious Council, the Christian Council of Liberia and the Council of Chiefs and Elders for their intervention to resolve the conflict that was brewing. We also wish to commend the National Legislature for its high degree of maturity exercised to put stability of the country first. Article 43 of the Liberian Constitution gives power to the House of Representatives to prepare an impeachment bill, and the Senate the power to try all impeachments. Article 71 also says that “The Chief Justice and the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court and the judges of subordinate courts of record may be removed upon impeachment and conviction by the Legislature based on proved misconduct, gross breach of duty, inability to perform the functions of their office, or conviction in a court of law for treason, bribery or other infamous crimes.”

Assuming that there were tangible reasons backing their action to impeach the three Associate Justices, Philip A. Z. Banks, Jamesetta Howard-Wolokollie and Kabineh Ja’neh, we see the Legislature’s decision to drop the impeachment proceeding as a way forward to sustain and maintain our peace and democracy, considering the adverse consequences impeachment would have wrought. We hope both branches will make their functions clear, so that each branch would not be seen as interfering with the function of the other. The Legislature contended during the conflict that the Supreme Court was trying to turn into a lawmaker and at the same time an interpreter. With such a concern making people to believe that one branch was overlapping the functions of the other, it is better for the two branches, and even all three branches, to engage in a retreat to acquaint one another with their respective functions in order to avoid such a conflict from recurring.

We, therefore, commend the Legislature for reconsidering its decision to drop the impeachment proceeding.

Authors

4 COMMENTS

  1. There should be no conference. For what Daily Observer? The separation is clear. In fact, you are still under the assumption, because of your bias, that the Supreme court was right. You have even advocated for such decision.

    Here’s the fact, despite the fact that the CoC was bad, the Supreme Court ursurp the role of the Legislature intentionally because of political considerations. This is the fact.

    Bravo to the Legislature for being farsighted in bringing this matter to closure. I hope this time around, regarding the Snowe’s case, they will allow the law to take its course instead of some twisted logic in misrepresenting the spirit of the law.

  2. THE TWO BRANCHES OR EVEN THE THREE BRANCHES ARE AWARE OF THE KEY PRINCIPLES AND PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION.

    THAT IS EVERY SINGLE MEMBER OF THE HOUSE AND EVERY SINGLE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, AND INDEED THE PRESIDENT, ARE VERY MUCH KNOWLEDGEABLE OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE SYSTEM OR DESIGN OF CHECKS AND BALANCES.

    THE PROBLEM IS ELLEN JOHNSON SIRLEAF, AMOS SAWYER, AND PHILIP BANKS, BELIEVING THEIR SELFISH INTEREST SHOULD TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE NATIONAL INTEREST.

    AND WITH SUCH CHARACTERS AS KABINEH JANEH, PHILIP BANKS, JAMESETTA HOWARD WOLOKOLIE, AND EVEN SEINE YUOH, ON THE SUPREME COURT BENCH EVER OBSEQUIOUSLY WAITING TO VOTE FOR THE INTEREST OF ELLEN JOHNSON SIRLEAF OR AT LEAST FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH INTEREST, TROUBLE IS BOUND TO TAKE CENTER STAGE IN OCTOBER! LEST I FORGET: WE AGREE WITH EVERY WORD YOU HAVE COMMENTED, J. MIAH GBASON!!!

  3. But you people do not know Kenneth Best? He is by nature and character a very bias person. He takes side hastily once he has perceived the other side not up for what he Kenneth believes, or he is not a beneficiary of the other side.

    You remember how for him Ellen Johnson Sirleaf was an angel all along but only became the devil personified when she brutally murdered his friend Harry A. Greaves Jr.

  4. The truth been told: All this is about Ellen Johnson Sirleaf intentional bent on reversing the obvious defeat of her preferred choice of successor ….Brumskine, or her clandestinely owned ANC.

    And the worst part about such diabolical intent is that these parties or candidates lack the grassroots following constituting the majority of the electorate; hence no match to such of her political foes as the CDC destined to win this election as they did in 2005 but was cheated, and would have won the 2011 election if the stage had been set for a free, fair, and truly DEMOCRATIC elections.

    And all she Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is depending on now is to have her NEC reverse the result again; and when the case reaches the Supreme Court, the now kangaroo court as usual rule on what Ellen Johnson Sirleaf wants….her selfish interest. THAT IS THE TIMING BOMB!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here