NEC Board Rejects Demand for Recusal; Ruling in LP, UP Vs NEC Case Expected Today

9
3254
NEC lawyers including Cllr. F. Musa Dean (center) called on the Board of Commissioners to throw out the LP's and UP's case.

The Board of Commissioners (BOC) of the National Elections Commission (NEC) yesterday rejected Liberty Party (LP)’s call demanding its recusal before any rerun or runoff election is held.

Appearing before the BOC, LP officially submitted its motion calling on the BOC to quit and for new commissioners to hear their complaints and conduct either the runoff or the rerun elections, should their plea be granted by the Supreme Court.

The BOC, however, quashed LP’s motion and went ahead with the hearing into the ongoing electoral dispute joint case filed against the Commission by the Liberty Party and Unity Party.

The BOC said Brumskine has no legal ground or reason that warrants their recusal.

Over the weekend by NEC hearing office denied and dismissed the two political parties’ alleged fraud and irregularities’ claims, leaving the two aggrieved parties to appeal to the BOC that is actually the principal accused party in the case.

LP meanwhile took an exception to the BOC’s refusal to recuse itself and is expected to formalize its appeal before the Supreme Court.

Notwithstanding, the two parties stood for hearing yesterday to prove before the BOC that the NEC chief hearing officer, Cllr. Muana S. Ville, was in error by trashing their claims as he ruled in the case on Friday, November 18.

In his opening statement, Cllr. Oswald Tweh of LP said the NEC intentionally committed electoral fraud on October 10 and, based on its magnitude, there is a need to allow a rerun of the representative and presidential elections.

“The right of our fellow citizens as delineated in Article 77 (b) of the 1986 constitution was violated on October 10 when they were denied the chance to vote due to the NEC’s negligence to make available a comprehensive Final Registration Roll (FRR). The late opening such as 2:30 p.m. of polling places and change of polling centers such as in Fuama, Bong County, without adequate notice to the voters, are among the gross irregularities and fraud that marked the October 10 polls,” Cllr. Tweh said.

Article 77 (b) states that all citizens at the age of 18 and above are entitled to the right of voting for all public officials in general as well as special public elections.

He pointed out that the NEC’s witnesses, executive director Lamin Lighe and political affairs director Joseph Yarsiah, did not debunk the accusation that the Commission did not create a new FRR at all other points.

On the contrary, Cllr. Benedict Sannoh of the intervening party (UP) disagreed on the call for a rerun but hoped that corrective measures would be taken at the end of the case.

It may be recalled that November 7 was the expected date for the runoff election between Vice President Joseph Nyuma Boakai of UP and Sen. George Manneh Weah of the Coalition for Democratic Change (CDC) but, due to an appeal filed by LP to the Supreme Court, a stay order was placed on the runoff; thereby calling on the Commission to look into all elections’ disputes before it before proceeding with any preparation for the runoff election.

Cllr. Sannoh said the NEC conducted October 10 elections with cruelty and disregard for the constitution. “The ruling of the hearing officer was vague and ambiguous and should be condemned by the BOC if only they consider themselves as a people of integrity.

“Cllr. Ville condemned all of our claims and termed our allegations as presumed allegations,” he said. “The NEC failed to abide by its regulation as enshrined in Section 3.6 of the Elections Laws. It calls for the FRR to be published not only at magistrates’ offices but at other public facilities across the country to allow voters to verify their voter registration information before the day of elections.”

When asked by a member of the board of commissioners, Samuel Joe, whether he (Sannoh) was informed that 75.2 percent of the 2.1 million registered voters voted with enthusiasm on October 10, both Tweh earlier and later Sannoh said as long as thousands of people did not vote due to alleged problems caused by the Commission, the 75.2 percent is not significant.

Sannoh named legal or constructive fraud and actual fraud as the two types anyone may commit. “They are focusing on actual fraud but we are not focusing on that. They have committed legal fraud so as to give a candidate an advantage in the elections. They have repeatedly told us that there were challenges but they failed to be specific,” he noted, adding that NEC’s challenges are frauds.

He called on the Commission to remove ghost names from the FRR and those who registered to vote and voted multiple times during the elections.

“This call, if heeded to will bring relief to the runoff elections,” Sannoh said.

Cllr. Varney Sherman, the lead lawyer for UP, supported Sannoh’s statement by pointing at the BOC and directly accused them of masterminding the fraud.

Cllr. Charles Walker Brumskine, the standard bearer of LP told the BOC that the legal campaign he is involved in with UP, ALP, and ANC by his side is intended to make his grandchildren express pride tomorrow in having a country free from the bad electoral system.

“What we are pushing here today is not about legal knowledge. Cllr. Musa Dean should know that if only he was looking at the bigger picture we are seeing,” Brumskine said, noting that it is unfortunate that the NEC that is accused of doing wrong is the same body investigating the matter.

“It is unfortunate that you are adjudicating a case involving yourself as the accused. You all know conscientiously that the NEC is not just an ordinary government agency. It is an administrative agency responsible to keep peace in the country through the conduct of free, fair and transparent elections,” he noted.

He told the BOC and the listening audience that inasmuch as it is said the burden of proof is on the shoulder of the accuser (in this case being his party and UP) it is also possible for the burden to shift from the accuser to the accused.

“For the sake of peculiarity, you have the evidence we need. Produce it and let’s see if we are falsely accusing you. Go and think. All of you should go and think,” he said firmly, pointing at each member of the BOC.

He referenced Commissioner Jonathan K. Weedor’s disagreement with Cllr. Jerome G. Korkoya as a melting point which questioned the entire BOC’s integrity, (excluding Weedor).

“I am 66 years old now and have been through the 1979 rice riot, April 12, 1980 coup ‘d’état, and the 1989 civil war but never threatened before as I am threatened now. I feel not secure at all and this is only so because I am up for a just cause. A cause to redeem our country from the bad electoral system as carried out by this Commission,” he said.

Reacting to LP and UP’s arguments, the defense counsel, Frank Musa Dean, said the two parties have failed and should accept their failures.

“The preponderance (prevalence) of evidence is not by the mere testimonies of numerous witnesses. It is not by hearsay testimony as provided by Cllr. Frances Jonson Allison who co-headed the conduct of the 2005 elections as well as served as a Chief Justice of our country,” Dean said.

He expressed his sorrow for LP and UP’s failure to acknowledge that their own witnesses, Wilmot Paye, chairman of UP and Josiah Flomo Joekai, a defeated candidate in Montserrado electoral district #3, lied in their testimonies that their names were not found on the FRR.

“It is sad to note that Joekai, with all his education, does not know the first law of nature which states that self-preservation is cardinal. Joekai, a former staff of the NEC went to the poll, failed and congratulated Ceebee C. D. Barshell, the victor in the representative race on October 10,” he said, adding that Joekai even wrote on social media stating that the October 10 polls were free, fair and transparent.

He said challenges and irregularities can in no way amount to massive fraud as claimed by LP, UP and others.

“The names of some of the voters were not found on the FRR because they queued at their voting centers as early as 3 a.m., the time that queue controllers were not yet assigned to those polling centers. Getting them on their rightful lines was an overwhelming challenge. This led to the creation of addenda to allow them to vote. We did not create a new FRR only because we allowed them to vote by accommodating them through the addenda,” Dean said.

He noted that the polls were not held in isolation of international partners. “All the international observers noted the challenges the Commission had at the polls but did not, in any report nullify the efforts of the Commission. They have not called for a rerun. Let LP and UP, the sympathizer, go and sit down. They have no case, BOC, trash it as the hearing office did and if they wish, let them go to the Supreme Court,” he said.

The BOC reserved ruling to be delivered today at 1 p.m.

Authors

9 COMMENTS

  1. As long as the constitutional decision of Liberia’s Jurisprudence is on time in keep with this nation’s election procedural process, immediately proceed with the Supreme decision of the Judicial interpretation. No matter how an individual or organization thinks to the contrary, it is authority given by the people of Liberia to its national jurisprudence that matters most to elect a new constitutional leader. The silent majority assures a smooth peaceful transition, the constitutional time arrival. Let the Liberian people know.
    Gone to 57% in silence. Do not answer this box.

  2. The Liberian nation’s in-keep is set and ready to proceed with the will of the Republic of Liberia.
    Gone. Do not reply. Let the people know.

  3. NEC BOC, your rejection to recuse yourself from any rerun or run-off is, indeed, a
    shameful act on your part. Who will trust you after you administered that fraudulent
    and apparently deliberate irregular act of performance? You messed up the elections
    and efforts are being made to correct your incompetent handling of the elections, then
    you rejected that? That is a prideful behavior on your part. Your rejection to step aside
    from the rerun or run-off is intended to delay and baffle the process. Can;t you see that?

  4. “On the contrary, Cllr. Benedict Sannoh of the intervening party (UP) disagreed on the call for a rerun but hoped that corrective measures would be taken at the end of the case”.

    We gladly say that’s one of the commonsensical statements made by the litigants, so far. By the way, one “corrective measure’ is publication of voters’ roll before run – off, including extra vigilance by both parties’ poll and votes – counting watchers. The fact of the matter is that the contesting parties knew NEC had overwhelming problems, so pretending to reform a historically ineffective electoral infrastructure in the middle of elections is simply political posturing to defiantly delay this year’s democratic transfer of power. Unquestionably, a violation of the constitutional right (Chapter 1, article1) of the people “to cause their public servants to leave office and to fill vacancies by regular elections…”

    As for Supreme Court justices eying tenure and therefore not above partisan wrangling; for example, as unraveled in the Code of Conduct fiasco that flummoxed the public regarding such commotion at the anchor supposed to steady our ship of state, we pray they realize that a rerun is just unnecessary procrastination. Not to mention that for the court to look down its nose at the UN Security Council cannot be a wise decision, to say the least.

    Lest we forget, the fantastic promises of politicians who won’t present voters with detailed cost – effective and planks – specific political platforms and how they would be paid for, aren’t serious commitments for anyone to start chest – beating about “interference”. We have seen how they enrich themselves monthly with bonanza compensations that should’ve been drastically reduced so that the savings would’ve been invested in an educated and skilled workforce towards reducing underdevelopment and widening inequality. This means eventually a new administration must get the support of the international community to attract and access foreign financial aids and investments to help the nation steer itself away from icebergs.

    Of course, needless to say that funding is the bridge with which to reach across the ethnic, social, and economic divides that have plagued our nation since 1847. After all, governance is more than having a PhD degree or speaking like an Oxford don; it requires energy, courage, compassion, charisma and connections. (We left out ‘character’ and ‘competence’ for two reasons: the first invisible, and the second unknowable before job performance).

    Please, for the sake of the vast majority Country – Congua poor feeling the pains of hard times, let’s think reconciliation, stability, peace, progress, not deadlock, disaster, deaths, and destruction. That’s our humble plea, folks.

  5. well all I can say if god do not say it do not do it. the will of jesus Christ is to cast lot for a new leader and so the apostles cast lot for the new apostle of jesus Christ.and so our own Liberian people is to do and have peace joy and happiness because election can cause war and joblessness and homelessness

  6. History will hold Chairman Jerome Kokoya of NEC responsible for denying so many Liberians to vote on election day. The duplication of voter ID cards with same numbers for one voter thereby creating the avenue for fraud is unacceptable. The officials at NEC know very well that they have failed the Liberian people. Their failure to acknowledge errors and frauds during the election is an example of how some Liberians lack trust and integrity. A simple apology from them admitting these errors would have settled the whole matter. Liberians are peaceful and forgiving people. Individuals like Prince Johnson and many others who committed atrocities during the civil crisis are are parading the streets of Monrovia freely with no one threatening them at all. As human beings, we are not freed from making human errors. We all make errors. But for them to have denied that there were no errors or frauds committed during the elections bothers me. What are kind of good examples are we setting for our children to follow in the future? All these people come from homes where their children are watching and seeing them lying.

Leave a Reply to Elijah F. Taylor Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here