Lawmakers to Resolve Differences in Supplementary Budget

0
290
The seat of the legislature.

The House of Representatives during its  Tuesday, February 23, 2021 session appointed a 7-man Conference Committee  to resolve differences with the Senate in the passage of the Supplementary Budget which was subsequently approved in two separate amounts by both Houses.
Members of the House of Representatives on  Wednesday, 10 February,  approved supplemental funding for the Financial Year 2020/2021 at US$10.5m to enable the government to deliver on programs that are in critical need of funds.

The Liberian Senate on last Thursday — 18 February,  voted to defer the Senate’s Ways and Means report for passage of the supplementary funding worth US$24 million dollars owing to differences of the proposed amount to that of the House.


Immediately after the Senate’s deferral at US$24m, a five-man Conference Committee was appointed with Bong County Senator Prince Moye (former House’s Ways, Means and Development Planning Chairman, and Deputy Speaker) serving as chairman to reconcile the figures.


Whereas, on Tuesday, the House’s presiding officer,  Rep. Acarous M. Gray (Chairman on Executive), appointed a 7-man Conference Committee headed by Ways, Means, Finance and Development Chairman Thomas Fallah. Members of the Committee include Rep. Ellen Attoh-Wreh, Rep. Matthew Zarzar, Rep. Dixon Seeboe, Rep. Clarence Massaquoi, Rep. Clarence Garr, and Rep. Samuel Kogar.


The Committee is tasked to meet the Senate’s Conference Committee to “Agree on a figure” and report to Plenary on Thursday, February 25.


It may be recalled that  President George M. Weah in his communications to the House of Representatives and Senate said his government has “Realized a windfall amid mounting expenditure demands for service deliverables beyond allocations in the approved budget of the Fiscal Year 2020/2021.”

Rules and Procedures

Meanwhile, according to the Rules and Procedures of the House and the Senate, Conference Committees are primarily set up to resolve legislative differences. A bill must be agreed to by both chambers in the same form before it can be presented to the President. Notably, the Constitution requires that any bill with revenue provisions must be a House bill. With this exception, it does not matter if a bill is passed first by the Senate or if it is passed first by the House.

Once a chamber passes a bill, it is engrossed – that is, prepared in official form – and then sent (or messaged) to the other chamber. In a majority of cases, the second chamber simply agrees to the exact text passed by the first chamber, in which case Congress has then completed its action on the bill.


In some cases, the second chamber instead decides to amend the first chamber’s bill. The second chamber is often proposing, in effect, an alternative version of the bill, which may differ from the bill in minor or substantial ways.

In some circumstances, the alternative may even embody a proposal on a different topic. Once the second chamber agrees to this proposed alternative to the bill, it may send the proposal back to the first chamber for possible consideration and a vote. The receiving chamber may also respond with a counterproposal, and so on. This back-and-forth trading of proposals by the House and Senate is called amendment exchange, or sometimes simply ping-pong. For the bill to have a chance of becoming law, one chamber must eventually agree to the proposal that the other chamber sent it.


Sometimes, the resolution of differences between the House and Senate proposals may instead be accomplished through a conference committee.  A conference committee is a temporary committee formed in relation to a specific bill; its task is to negotiate a proposal that can be agreed to by both chambers. Each conference committee is made up of members of the House and members of the Senate – called conferees – who are drawn primarily from the committees with jurisdiction over the bill.

Through a combination of informal negotiations and formal meetings, the conferees try to hammer out a compromise, drawing on elements of the competing proposals that were adopted by each chamber. If a proposal can garner the support of a majority of the House conferees, and also separately, a majority of the Senate conferees, then the negotiated proposal is embodied in a conference report.


 This conference report can then be considered in one chamber, and, if agreed to, then considered in the other chamber. Regardless of which chamber goes first, the conference report is considered under sets of procedures used for other businesses. For example, reaching a vote on a conference report in the Senate may require a cloture process. For the bill to move to the next step in becoming law requires both chambers to agree to the conference report without changes.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here